Be ready to investigate a personal-data breach with evidence, not guesswork.
SURAGX can support the investigative work needed to establish what happened, what may be affected, what evidence supports the conclusion and what remediation context should be documented. Product use does not itself create DPDP compliance.
Rule 7 includes detailed Board information within 72 hours after awareness when applicable, subject to a longer period the Board may allow.
NOT A PRODUCT SLAInvestigate
Scope
Document
Prepare
Security safeguards, visibility and breach investigation.
Rule 6 of the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 sets out minimum reasonable-security safeguards that include appropriate access controls, logs/monitoring/review to enable detection, investigation and remediation, backups/continuity measures, and retention of specified logs/personal data for one year unless another law requires otherwise.
Rule 7 sets out breach-intimation requirements. It includes information about the nature, extent and timing of a breach, likely impact, mitigation and remediation; it also provides for an updated detailed intimation to the Board within seventy-two hours after awareness, or a longer period the Board may allow on written request.
Investigation support — not automatic compliance.
Safe public wording: SURAGX is designed to support evidence-backed breach investigation, provenance, timeline reconstruction, scope assessment, remediation context and report preparation.
“Using SURAGX makes an organisation DPDP compliant,” “certified compliance,” or “72-hour guaranteed compliance.” Applicability, commencement, notifications and legal decisions remain with the organisation and its advisers.
From suspected breach to evidence-backed facts.
The workflow below describes investigative support. It does not replace the organisation’s regulatory, legal, communications or notification process.
Time-sensitive investigation
Organise evidence and investigative questions so teams can establish facts quickly when reporting deadlines apply.
Evidence trail
Server-side hashing, provenance and proof references are designed to preserve how conclusions were reached.
Structured findings
Findings can carry supporting proof, contradictions, evidence gaps, confidence rationale and analyst status.
Human decision
Only human-confirmed findings are designed to appear as authoritative conclusions in final reports by default.
Regulatory note: the DPDP Rules 2025 use a phased commencement framework. Organisations should verify which provisions are in force and applicable to them at the relevant time. This page is product information, not legal advice.